Just announced: The Wizarding World of Harry Potter™ is coming Spring 2016! #WizardingWorldHollywood pic.twitter.com/kNG7VFcOoK
— Universal Studios (@UniStudios) June 2, 2015
In addition, Universal has confirmed that the Flight of the Hippogriff coaster will be coming to Hollywood, which would be the park's first outdoor coaster. In addition, the park will be getting the 3D version of the Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey ride, which recently debuted at Universal Studios Japan.
From the park's press release:
“The Wizarding World of Harry Potter” will resonate with immense detail, inviting guests to revel in Harry Potter’s epicurean world with the opportunity to enjoy authentic food and beverage at multiple locations, including: Three Broomsticks™ and Hog's Head pub, as well the Magic Neep and Butterbeer™ carts.A foray through the shops will add to the authenticity of the land with eight retail shops and locations, including Honeydukes™, Ollivanders™, Owl Post™, Zonko’s™ Joke Shop, Wiseacre's Wizarding Equipment, Dervish and Banges, Gladrags Wizardwear and Filch’s Emporium of Confiscated Goods™.
Previously, the park had announced that the Wizarding World would open in 2016, but hadn't been more specific than that. The original Wizarding World, at Universal Orlando's Islands of Adventure, opened in June 2010, after having been announced for a "spring" opening, as well. So given that Universal takes "spring" literally, any opening between March and June of 2016 would be in play now for the new land.
Update: Here is the official announcement video:
In it, Universal officials say that the land will open in "less than a year," suggesting an opening in May or earlier, as opposed to the June "spring" opening at Universal's Islands of Adventure.
Finally, in case anyone is curious, the long-term "Evolution" plans for the park call for a new attraction to replace the Waterworld stunt show theater, and some of the specific documents for that suggest that location might be the site for Diagon Alley. (Though, to be honest, I don't see how they'd fit a Gringotts ride in there.) As for a Hogwarts Express to connect that land with the announced Hogsmeade, Universal only needs enough space for the two stations, plus the length of one train and two track switches between them. Remember that the Hogwarts Express trains don't have to be moving while the show plays! They'd be hidden from public view while in transit anyway. Diagon Alley followed the original Wizarding World in Orlando by four years, so one might expect that Universal would take several years before proceeding with any expansion of the Wizarding World in Hollywood, too.
You Might Also Like:
Tweet
I hope upgraded means 3D for the Forbidden Journey.
So true. Hippogriff is probably the only kiddie coaster I know whose wait time can go to 60 minutes.
I was also hoping for the announcement of an entirely original
Harry Potter ride in addition to Forbidden Journey. The East Coast already exceeds the West Coast in numbers of attractions not shared between the two, so why not?
I wear glasses, so 3D is a bit tricky for me -- tolerable, but awkward. I enjoy Gringotts, but because of the glasses, I find myself glad that the ride isn't more exciting (a la the Mummy) only because I'd be afraid the glasses would fly off. Which brings me to FJ -- that sucker flips around a lot, particularly at the whomping willow. I think I'd spend the whole time trying to hold on to the glasses, which would affect my enjoyment of the ride. Does anyone else think this might be a problem for some folks?
Besides, the Waterworld show takes up far less space than Jaws did, so it would have to be highly compressed to fit in there. The Gringotts building could fit there, but not much else. If that does end up happening, I can't imagine it would take on the Diagon Alley theme (maybe Willy Wonka? Hope so!). If they wanted more room for shops and experiences, they should consider removing Shrek and adding on to the land in that spot.
Closing waterworld saddens me. The stunt show is classic universal studios. I remember when miami vice, conan, and the wild west show were all playing at once.
Finally, hippogriff is a good choice. It's a mild coaster and universal needs more mild attractons if they ever want a piece of Disney's pie.
They don't. I didn't visit the Orlando version knowing the California version is coming. Since when did cloned rides turned out different?
In any case, I've been to Orlando, so this news is pretty moot to me.
"Universal Hollywood really missed out on a great opportunity to draw in worldwide attention from Potter Nation by going copycat."
All the books are located at Hogswarts. You want them to be somewhere else?
Hey, Universal is supposed to be in the big leagues now - we should expect more from them than a slimmed down version of something they already opened in 2010 (Orlando) and again in 2014 (Japan).
On an more positive note, if USH does eventually build a Hogwart's Train in the park I could ride their version without paying the ridiculous $45 up-charge they deceitfully try to sucker people into buying in Orlando! Bravo!!
Fast & Furious? Does that do anything for you?
Hey, I'm not saying adding a copycat version of Japan's Harry Potter "land" to USH is a bad thing - just saying it does not provide a compelling reason for families east of the desert to make USH a destination in and of itself. At best it is still just a single day stop on a longer SoCal vacation.
I'm also surprised there was nothing about the possible new hotels. I thought 2 new hotels were included in the evolution plan and I assumed they would open with the Wizarding World.
Other topic, Dragon Challenge. C'mon people, yeah I like that ride too but they would have to displace 100 thousand people in LA to put that up. They already worked brilliantly to find the space for the Wizarding World, adding the Dragons is very unrealistic. Gee the Flying Hippogriff is a bonus considering the lack of real estate.
Im way excited for this opening up and Ive been to the Orlando Wizarding World several times. My two favorite rides in the country (FJ and Transformers) plus new fast and furious plus old favorites and Horror Nights all in the same park with a pretty darn unique and genuine setting. Oh yeah, this place rocks and its getting better!
And FWIW I was one of many people who felt Transformers should have remained a USH exclusive in the States. Orlando already had Spider-Man, they didn't need it.
First Back To The Future, then Jaws, and now Waterworld...it's official, Universal is begging on their knees for me to visit their Japan park.
I just think it's a huge mistake to get rid of their last stunt show in favor of Diagonalley. Yes, HP is a huge franchise, and I'm a fan of the movies, but I'm with James in the sense that Universal Parks missed out on a huge opportunity to provide non-cloned attractions.
With F&F, while the movies are my guilty pleasure, I don't really care for an upgraded King Kong. This goes back to my concern about everything in Universal transforming into screens with 3D projections. Your brain can tell the difference between a screen and a physical object in space.
Universal is different from Disney though and waterworld still has a chance to stay...at the very least for three more years
As a Floridian, just wanted to let you know that them's fightin' words! There's PLENTY of other great stuff to do in Florida other than theme parks. (Though, grant it, whether or not you prefer the stuff here in Florida to the stuff in SoCal depends on personal preference, I guess) In fact, drive about 90 minutes southwest of Orlando, (which is probably about the typical trip to the grocery store in LA) and you'll be in Tampa, which has a little bit of everything great in Florida. Great beaches (which you can always visit when it's "hot as hell"), a busy night life, some very beautiful nature areas, a fair amount of ethnic diversity, and yes, another theme park.
I know you're intent most likely wasn't to offend anyone, but I felt like I had to stick up for my good ol' home sweet home.
Don't worry. No hard feelings.
Also, sorry if I came across as a little too defensive.
This article has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.