Here are some interesting (to me) take-aways:
Cumulative attendance for the Six Flags parks was 30.4 million in 2017. But that was up just 300,000 visitors over last year, despite the chain opening two new water parks. For reference, while Six Flags attracts more visitors than Cedar Fair or SeaWorld/Busch Gardens do with their parks, Six Flags' 30.4 million is less than the cumulative attendance of the Magic Kingdom plus just one of the other three Walt Disney World theme parks.
Sixty-three percent of the park's attendance comes from passholders. Six Flags said the number of people holding passes was up 10 percent last year. (But I couldn't find that Six Flags actually reported the total number of its passholders.)
Guest spending per capita at Six Flags is $41.61, which was up 54 cents from 2016. Admissions revenue was up 61 cents per visit last year, so in-park guest spending was down seven cents a visit. If your strategy is discounting admission to gain money on in-park spending, that seven-cent decrease is not a good trend.
Nevertheless, Six Flags says that its passholders generate double the cash flow of a single-day guest over the course of a season. The company also points out that emphasizing pass sales provides an excellent hedge against bad weather, which can cripple single-day, walk-up ticket sales.
Nine million of the company's $17 million in revenue growth in the fourth quarter came from an increase in international licensing fees. Six Flags in China and Dubai are paying off for the company before they even open.
Six Flags is reporting a modified EBITDA margin of 41.1 percent, which it claims is the highest in the industry. That would make it seem like the company is swimming in cash (which maybe it should be spending on new rides?), but Six Flags also reports $1.94 billion in debt, which it says represents a net leverage ratio of 3.7 times Adjusted EBITDA. So that might explain the lack of expansive major new coasters or dark rides from the chain this year.
Theme park fans with accounting degrees, take it from here, please.
TweetHowever, it is rare for us to spend any money at the parks, other than adding ice cream to a funnel cake ($2). We share the meals and snacks (we know which things to order to stretch the meal passes).
This past year, we only visited Great Adventure a couple of times, but we visited 3 other six flags (Baltimore, New England and Lake George).
Sum it up, the passes are a bargain.
Would I visit a six flags if I had to pay the gate price plus parking and food? Never.
The monthly payment phenomenon is incredible right now, and I don't understand why people continue to submit to it. Everything is sold in monthly installments now a days, and companies in virtually every industry are taking note. Even Volvo is selling (really leasing) cars this way by allowing consumers to "buy" a car that includes all maintenance, insurance, and everything associated with owning a car aside from fuel, for a "low monthly payment". I can only imagine how many people pay a monthly installment for something they either don't use or forget they have (most monthly payments are debited electronically from bank accounts). From Netflix to Blue Apron to fancy cell phone installments to delivered specialty boxes to newspaper/magazine subscriptions and on and on. Everything now has become a monthly debit from your bank account. Theme parks are a little late to the party, but it's a viable model. By spreading out payments over 12 months (or a typical operational season for parks in northern climates) it not only makes season "memberships" seem more affordable, but it allows parks to increase prices more without the same backlash. Before, a $10 increase in a season pass might be enough to turn existing pass holders away, but by spreading that increase out over the year and advertising the increase as "less than $1 more" (per month), then parks get fewer complaints and increase retention.
The fad is pretty incredible, and I still don't get how people are so willing to buy things in this manner, but it really works, and is likely to continue to expand.
The real money at Six Flags is made off of flash pass and dining pass. By selling season passes dirt cheap and using aggressive upselling they have made the "spirit airlines" model of theme park work pretty well.
I wonder if this also true for Disneyland's annual passholders. People who bemoan the crowds at Disneyland always say that Disney should limit annual passes because single day guests spend more than passholders. Six Flags is saying that passholders actually spend more over the course of a season.
It also makes sense that the annual pass is a hedge for the park against bad weather. Add in that probably a significant amount of passholders don't take full advantage of their pass, and it's no wonder Disney keeps promoting the annual passes.
I get it that the lower price point attracts people that Disneyland does not, but then Disney keeps close control on their crowds. Six Flags would be wise to spend some of that loot and increase security--it would greatly help their reputation with families.
This article has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.
In other words, sell people memberships that they won't end up using all that often, so that the membership fees end up being mostly profit.
Am I missing something?